Preparing to edit in CS6

The workflow with DSLR footage and Premiere Pro is different from what I am used to doing with tape based media in FCP 6 and 7.  So I've worked my way through the approach I intend to use in light of these changes.

Old skool

Media Managing.

There are people employed in Newsrooms , edit suites and on location who's sole responsibility is managing the torrent of digital media generated.  However you have to do this for yourself.  Before you start your project it makes good sense and good practice to think ahead to later in the project where all the files have proliferated and you start to lose track of what things are, where they came from and where you saved them.  Add the further complications of working with other team members who may have added material in the meanwhile, breaks in the ingest/capture/editing and then (most problematic of all) the need to move the project to another place or machine, and you have a near certainty of problems.  These will inevitably impact on your time/deadline.  So start ORGANISED and stick to your system/protocols.  What follows is mine current workflow.  (I expect to refine it as I work on various projects and get used to Premiere.  In some ways it's more complicated than FCP because of the 'round-tripping' between so many applications.)

A folder/file structure outside of the NLE.

Start by creating your file hierarchy.  I have created a template so that I can refine it when I find that there is an omission to the folders and files.  It saves time just to copy it and then rename the main folder.  I then use the file structure whenever I have to save material related to that project.  It's a 'project based setup' as opposed to a 'system-based set up'.  I want to make these decisions on a project by project basis.  I want to be able to move the main folder in the knowledge that all the files and media for the project will be moved too.

File structure of template Project folder and sub folders

I have followed the suggestion from 'An Editor's Guide to Adobe Premier Pro'.  It includes folders and sub folders that might be required for a CS6 project.  I've learnt through bitter experience that I need to save and work efficiently and be able to back up and archive correctly.  The workflow is different for me since it's not tape based and I am now using Premiere rather than FCP. 

DSLR Workflow.

Bringing in the Media to the Computer. 

Use BRIDGE.  Yes, Bridge - it's not just for Photos.

Using Bridge is useful since it's comes with CS6, is fairly intuitive and allows you to batch rename the files and add to the 'metadata'.  I created a Preset that followed a protocol that I hope will make things easier later when I start to manage the projects media.  The file names are changed from 'MVI_0272' which means very little to me to 'MMDDYY600D_MolesCafe_MVI_0272'.  This gives me easy access to the date the media was shot, the camera used and the location and the original file name.  Putting the date first means that the computer will automatically organise the media in the order it was shot.  Fine for drama or music videos.  For a drama I might start with the scene number/shot/take/camera/date so that they automatically organise into scenes later in Premiere.  Afterall the scenes and shots are unlikely to have been shot in script or continuity order.






Confusingly you can use Adobe Prelude to 'ingest' - adding media to the Computer.  It also allows you to transcode it from one format/codec to another while moving it off the SD card/P2 card to wherever you want.  You can simultaneously create several copies in different locations.  It will also 'verify' the copy.  This makes sure that it's an exact bit for bit copy or 'clone' of the file.  You can also log the clips and create a rough cut in Prelude.  It will also send all of this directly to Premiere.  Oddly you can't batch rename in Prelude.  In Bridge you can't verify, which is odd too.

Creating a disk Image. 

Richard Harrington suggests that you alway create a disc image of your tapeless media as an exact archive on a different drive.  You do this using OSx's 'Disk Utility'.  This is a verified copy of the original card.  Double clicking it will open it like a folder from where you can re-name, ingest or import into your Project Folder.  So adding another stage to the process, and you haven't even started to edit yet!  Which to use?  You choose.

Setting up Premiere.

Under Preferences>Media make sure 'save Media cache files next to originals when possible' is checked.  These are rendered files that will speed up playback when you are editing.  They are not large but its a good idea to keep them with the Project files.  If you were to move the project they would need rendering again.

When you set up a New Project make sure Project>Project Settings>Scratch Disks make sure that Captured Video, Captured Audio, Video Previews and Audio Previews are all set to 'Same as Project'.

Some important terminology.

In terms of Premier Pro 'capture' means recording media into a project as in playing off tape and capturing into a project.  That captured video will be created and stored in the project folders you have defined.  Media that is 'imported' into a project is in fact LINKED to the project but importantly it stays where it was linked or referenced from.  Thats why you need to move it to your project folder outside of the editing software.  (The same with FCP).

Handling Dual System audio.

Where you have recorded high quality audio in addition to the DSLR's built-in mic ('dual system') you can re-sync the audio, in the Project Panel, to the video in Premiere Pro using the 'Merge Clips' option under the Clip menu and markers you have created at the sync points.  Remember thats not a 'new' clip but a reference file created in Premiere that links one video file with one audio file.  The 'real' files remain where they were originally stored as individual files.  They are linked and named '-linked' only in the Premiere project they relate to.

Saving time on common projects.

Just as I used a Common Media Folder template outside the NLE, you can create your own Project settings preset and template Project and save that as a project.  This will have your preferred settings and Bins and Sequences etc.  You just rename when you create another project.

Final Thought.

If this all seems like a lot of fuss, I know you want to edit not be a librarian.  At some point you will get your project in a tangle and you will learn the same way we all have.  There is a short cut  and it's actually outlined above!  If you mess up I wont say I told you so.  It's pointless and unhelpful.  Next time you'll know to take control.  It's just a shame that you have to learn the hard way!

Experiments in DSLR filming.

I decided that over Christmas I would get some experience of shooting video on a DSLR as opposed to using a DV camera shooting to tape, or my iPhone 4s' shooting highly compressed H264.  The University has just bought a number of Canon 600D's a remarkable camera at an extraordinary price-break  at £450  (with kit zoom lens 18 - 55mm) it shoots in Full HD (1080p) with an ISO range of 100 - 6400.  It has a swing out articulated screen, is light and easily portable.

The standard lens is rather slow (f3.5 to f5.6) so I also borrowed a 35mm f1.8 lens and a 50mm f1.8 lens.  I thought that these would work better under the low light stage conditions I was likely to encounter.

13th Dec 2012. The Louisiana, Bristol.

Setting up the camera in advance I was faced with using the automated video settings or using my own.  I shot the first gig using the auto settings for the sharpness, contrast and colour.  Since I expected the auto audio settings to be bad under gig conditions - the levels would tend to 'pump' as the gain is increased and decreased with variation of ambient levels.  So I switched the audio settings into manual and made a guess at a level - reducing the record level to about 25% of it's range.  I figured this would be sufficient.  I didn't realise that I wouldn't be able to monitor the audio levels while the view finder was 'live'.

There first thing I noticed was that exposure is set up quite differently.  I could select the video settings for frame rate and frame size.  Exposure was then balanced by manually setting the aperture (f number) and varying the ISO.  There were intervals of 64, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, 3200, 6400.  That's a doubling of light or 1m stop =/-.  There was a fair bit of light so the ISO was set at 200 to ensure great quality.  But it meant that I was shooting 'wide open' at f1.8.  So the DOF was very shallow and the focus critical.  The camera allows the use of the digital zoom as a form of 'expanded focus' which was useful to check the focus point,  but it wont operate while recording.  (Unlike the Z1 for example).

I only had the 50mm for this gig - and I wished I had a wider lens.  It was difficult covering the 3 piece band.


(direct from camera, auto settings and incorrectly manually set audio.  Compressed by Media Encoder using HD YouTube setting)

I know from the exposure level that I wouldn't have got much video with the iPhone but I thought the Canon 600D images were really excellent.  However the colours were rather over the top and the focus seemed 'soft'.  So I tweaked the User Preset to increase the sharpness and decrease the colour saturation.  I'd shoot again.  Sadly the audio was 'over recorded' in the loader sections of the songs so that particular recording was ruined.  Although the quality and frame size meant that stills grabbed from the timeline were very useable.

Sample frame grabs from first Louis footage (1080p).  These are unprocessed grabs.  Normally I would Photoshop them to set levels etc.

30th Dec 2012. Moles Cafe, Bath.

The next gig was in Bath at Moles cafe.  There was one central light that slowly changed colour.  The light levels varied by about a stop or so.  I shot Big Green Uncle at 200 ISO and Alfred at 400 ISO.  This time I had the 35mm lens, which I knew from taking stills at the venue previously, would be well suited to cover the bands.  I had also read up more on camera settings and I had learnt that the contrast setting needs to be set at zero - to avoid the highlights burning out.  The colour level needs to be reduced by about 30% and the sharpness should be left at zero.  Sharpness and colour should be added in post.  It's much more flexible and will avoid 'moire' which is a common DSLR artifact.  Rather than recording a 'perfect' video the idea is to record a 'flat' video image that then offers a recording of the greatest range possible.  The look or grade is then added in Post.  I found this very useful video on YouTube.  It covers these points well.


(DSLR tutorial)



Big Green Uncle.  As mentioned above, they were quite well lit - except from the colour changes.  I struggled with the focus on this.  I was wide open at f1.8 at 200 ISO.  I would have been better dropping to 400 ISO and stopping down abit.

Next up was Alfred.  The split lead singers were a problem since they were both 'out of the light'.  Only George the drummer was in the light.  So I had to set the exposure on the singers - and Joe camera right - was almost a stop darker than Frank.  Plus the light kept rotating and changing too.  I set the ISO at 400 to give me more exposure and stopped down slightly.  The aperture can be set in fractions of a stop, unlike the ISO which is always whole steps.



In order to edit and do the post on the DSLR footage I experimented with Premier Pro.  I had a copy of The Editor's guide to Adobe Premiere Pro and I worked through the book with the provided video and my test recordings.  It was great to bring the material directly from the SD card into the Mac.  The book recommends making a disk image of the card as a master copy.  The files are then opened from the disk image and copied into the working Project folder.  So the material ends up being in 2 places.  A master copy and a working copy.  It's still a quicker workflow than FCP's requirement to convert to ProRes which triples the sizes of the rushes.  That makes 4 times the storage issues!

9th Dec 2013.  By way of comparison here is some video footage shot previously at Moles on an iPhone 4s - using the FilmicPro iApp.  This has been the 'standard' way I have filmed Stevie Jo's gigs.  Quick, easy and very portable.  Generally fine for YouTube upload.



High Def playback on my old Mac Pro was stuttery.  The machine struggles to playback 1080p - it also lacks loads of headroom on it's hard drive, which doesn't help.  But it was workable, just.  Exporting the colour corrected footage took ages since it also compressed it down fro YouTube upload.

I wasn't happy with my CC work.  There is a setting in Premiere that smooths the effect over a range of frames which I had needed to select.  So as a result there is an undesirable  flickering effect.  I didn't do much in the way of CC. There was a large range in adjustment that could be made.  The Shadow/Highlight filter in particular was stunning.  It allowed me to boost the mid range and balance the exposure slightly.  The scopes worked well and I was attentive to the luma values - raising the values around the 60% value without removing the lighting effect visible at the time.

Original uncorrected footage.

With Shadow/Highlight filter applied. (Too much)










With Shadow/ Highlight filter reduced slightly to deepen the shadows but preserving highlight detail.








A second attempt to colour correct the Alfred Footage.  Having learnt my lesson, the colour correction on this export works better with no flicker effect.

4th Jan 2013. The Louisiana, Bristol (again).

Having practiced at Moles I then got another chance to shoot at the Louis again.  This time I had the 35mm lens and was using my newly understood User Preset.  I would set the audio much more carefully this time.

Sadly Stevie was suffering with a very sore throat so musically the gig wasn't as good as the first.  But from a camera point of view the recording was technically better.  The audio levels were fine - albeit low quality from the small/cheap on board mic.  The lens was ideal.  I noticed that there was half as much light as previously, so instead of shooting at 200 ISO I shot at 400 ISO.  I also decided to underexpose slightly so see how that affected the grade in Post.  If also offered me slightly deeper DOF so the focus wasn't so critical.



So on balance:

• the settings on the camera need to be configured to produce the widest range of expsure and colour values
• the onboard audio is not as good as the video quality
• with one camera the ideal lens is probably a 35mm or equivalent.  Which 2 cameras, the second camera should probably have a 50 or 80mm or equivalent
• the workflow with Premier Pro and for DSLR is quite different to FCP 6 and 7 and DV cameras such as the Sony Z1 and PD 170
• a simple way to cover a gig like this would be with 2 cameras.  A wide (35mm) and a clorser camera (50mm) with a quality sound feed from the mixer.  This would be post synced later on Ingest

I need to learn more about colour correction in CS6.  There are 3 ways of doing this, in Premiere, After Effects and Speedgrade.  Too many choices!  The control of workflow and media management is even more critical using this type of format and recoding equipment.  The 600D represents extraordinary value for money against a camcorder.  But it needs a range of ND filters, a handful of SD fast large cards, fast lens and some form of stabilisation.  I used a monopod - a device that I have loved for a long time!  The great news is - it works brilliantly with a DSLR.

Social Media for Practitioners

Social media for Practitioners from mikejohnston

Why worry about Social media? 

Well there's value in reputation, as there has always been.  It has been suggested that we have moved to a 'reputation economy'.  Social Media offers the Practitioner the opportunity to engage in conversations with other Practitioners and also their potential cunstomers.  But there are many issues not least around attention and time.  It comes down to focus, filtering and practice.

Understanding the power of networks underlies what we are discussing here.  Here is a great video that explains and illustrates this brilliantly.  It also introduces the idea of how knowledge is organised and organisation online will pop up again when you consider hashtags.




Where peoples' interest is aroused then they will propagate what they have found, learnt or experienced.  We have seen things that have suddenly been picked up and gain massive exposure, known as 'going viral'.  This video has been viewed 21, 372, 046 times in under 2 years.

How is it useful to Practitioners?

Here is an example of a band who have clearly spent a long time creating their online presence.  It's consistent but very connected in terms of the services they have used. 

Here is a smaller scale example of a great local (Bristol) artist Nuala Honan she is on;
Tumblr
Twitter
Bandcamp
Soundcloud

But the link to a Facebook is broken.  That's a shame since it's probably her most important connection.  Facebook deserves a whole workshop just on it's own.  Here's FB's recent advert.  It still amazes me!

Twitter basics.

Not one but 2 great guides:

• LSE guide to Twitter for academics - a fantastic guide that applies to practically everyone!
• The Beginner's guide to Twitter.

I used Twitterfall in the class which allowed me to enter the hashtag #iciasat and all tweets with that tag where then displayed in real time.  Twitter requires you to understand the importance of the name you use, your 'bio', 140 characters, #hashtags and url shortening.

There are ways of curating Tweets such as Storify, Paperli and Twylar. 

There are Twitter 'clients' (applications) that allow you to tweet and manage several social media streams (accounts) such as Hootsuite and Tweetdeck.  I can't get on with either!

At Bath Spa University we have been using social media to cover events live.  This is a good example of the uses of SM.  The Social Media Experiment.

What to write or blog?  YouTube created a great resource called The Creator Play Book.  Below is the old version.  The newer is available here.  It gives you a good idea of the way to engage people with video but the lessons are broadly applicable.

Photography.

There is a huge value to images online.  You can't afford to ignore this.

One of the oldest established service is Flickr but sadly it's been left to rust by Yahoo who bought it a few years ago when it was the 'go to place' for photos and photography on the Net.  It's been over taken in some ways by Instagram.  Here's my Instagram displayed with Statigram some things are more popular that others.  Notice the popularity of pets, plates (ie food before and after) and sunsets!

How Journalists are using Instagram (Pinterest, Google+, Soundcloud)

Facebook bought Instagram rather spectacularly and as a result here's the 'mashup' FB meets Instagram.

There is a huge photographic community online.  Tumblr, a blogging platform works very well for photography and has a very active community too - it's very connected.  Here's My Tumblr PhotoBlog.  Here's an example of a themed 'photoblog'.  I think it's rather good. London Shop Fronts 

Blogging basics

Blogging basics from mikejohnston

I use Blogger for my own blogs and currently with the students I work with.
There are some basic rules - this covers the main points well Do you make these mistakes when you  blog?

The requirement for images and video has become easier to satisfy.  Alot can be done with a modern smart phone.  I would suggest the purchase of one would be a good way into social media both as a way of understanding it and using it.  My current preference is the iPhone 4S.

Video publishing

Video publishing from mikejohnston

As well as video there is audio too.  Although this might be less applicable in some situations.

Audio publishing 2.0 from mikejohnston

A large part of social media is in discovery and curation and you should think about fitting into this ecosystem!  Pinterest is worth exploring.

Lastly you might like to explore using Linked in.  You can find me there.  I also have an 'AboutMe' account that provides a useful place to collect all my online activities.

Lessons in 'Quick turnaround' event coverage

Last March I took part in Bath Spa University's 'Social Media Experiment' coverage of X Media Lab Conference in Bath using Social Media.  X Media Lab Bath 2012 presented a great opportunity for Bath Spa University’s staff and students. A live, high-profile digital media event right on our doorstep. Event directors, Brendan Harkin and Megan Elliot, offered us a project that would enable students to use their media creation and publishing skills. I would support the students as Producer, helping them provide a variety of video coverage of the event.  We went on to produce 3 'quick turnaround' videos.  One shot during the VIP event launch at the Roman baths (Thursday).




One at the end of the main conference day (Friday).



One at the end of the mentoring weekend (Monday)



Later over the summer we produced a final 'overview' edit using all the material.



The footage was shot on Sony Z1 DV (tape) based cameras with some further material from Canon 7D.  It was a relatively slow and traditional process of ingesting, logging and capturing and editing.  The 'quick turnaround' wasn't bad but it wasn't actually very quick.

Today the Social Media Experiment was covering the ExPlay 12 event in Bath.  This time I decided to restrict the video team to iPhone.  How did we do?  How would it compare?

The quickest turnaround is 'one step' publishing.  We shot very short 'video bites'.  Then with no editing uploaded to YouTube and then Tweeted the link.  It worked but, perhaps having become used to having the ability to edit, I felt that the bites needed 'top 'n' tailing' - trimming, to tidy them up.  The uploading and tweeting workflow wasn't smooth.  Shot in Filmic Pro - uploaded to YouTube - tweeted.  All the detail and hashtags were entered twice without a keyboard.

'Two step' publishing was easier in someways.  Shoot on phone.  Transfer via USB lead and Image Capture.  Trim in QuickTime.  Upload to YouTube.  Tweet from YouTube.  Naturally we needed a laptop.  But the whole kit we used filled one shoulder bag.  YouTube does take a while - not long but worth noting.  Sadly when you tweet from YouTube the description doesn't automatically populate the tweet.  Which would have been neat and sweet!

The iPhone worked quite well - a 4s.  Problems with focus 'bubbling' and exposure meant that we used Filmic Pro which allows the frame rate to be set along with the focus point and the exposure.  We also had a small LED light (TecPro 'Fillini') which worked really well and made a huge difference to the quality of the image.  However the video quality wasn't high - not sure why we set it so low.  The interview eyelines were difficult to bring around enough.  Shooting video runs the batteries down quickly and we had to re charge at lunch time.  It's awkward to hold, so some sort of grip would have been a good idea.  Certainly a monopod would have helped.  Even without support, the videos were shake-free as a result of the image stabilisation in the app.  I had slight concerns that Interviewees wouldn't take us seriously with the iPhone - but this wasn't an problem.  None were surprised.  We used a shotgun mic (K6+ME66) with the phone - the built in mic would rarely have worked in the noise.  I made the lead by following this tutorial.

We started at about 11am and finished about 4pm.  All 15 of the video bites were up and tweeted by a leisurely 6pm.  As well as tweeting them individually they were playlisted in YouTube as and drawn into  Storify.



Lessons learnt?  Don't leave home with a decent mic and portable light.  Downloading the clips via USB and trimming in a laptop is the most sensible route to go.  Maybe it might work better with an iPad and editing in iMovie.  Tomorrow we'll give it a go.  I have my doubts about the ergonomics of shooting with the iPad and Filmic Pro is not full screen on the iPad.  But it will be interesting to compare with today's experience.